Bridging the Gap: Why Justice-Involved Data Exchange with Behavioral Health and SUD Providers Is Critical

In the evolving landscape of whole-person care, few intersections are as consequential—and as underserved—as the one between the criminal justice system and behavioral health. Justice-involved individuals often face significant health challenges, including disproportionately high rates of mental illness and substance use disorders (SUD). Yet, the data that could support effective, coordinated care across settings—particularly between correctional health providers and community-based behavioral health and SUD providers—is too often fragmented, inaccessible, or entirely missing.

A robust and secure justice-involved data exchange can change that. By enabling timely, bi-directional sharing of health data during incarceration and after release, we can improve outcomes, reduce recidivism, and significantly cut public spending.

The Health Crisis Behind Bars

National data underscores the urgency:

• 63% of sentenced jail inmates and 56% of state prisoners have a mental health problem (Bureau of Justice Statistics).

• 58% of individuals in state prisons and 63% in jails meet the criteria for drug dependence or abuse (BJS).

• Individuals released from incarceration are 129 times more likely to die from a drug overdose within two weeks of release (NEJM).

These statistics reveal a population that is both high-need and high-risk, especially during transitions of care.

The Incarceration–Community Health Data Gap

When someone enters a jail or prison, their connection to outside medical records often ends at intake. Correctional health providers, usually working with siloed systems or outdated paper records, lack access to critical medical history—diagnoses, medications, prior behavioral health care, or SUD treatment plans. This puts lives at risk and increases the likelihood of emergency care, withdrawal complications, or medication lapses.

Upon release, the problem worsens. Formerly incarcerated individuals often return to the community without discharge summaries, care coordination, or linkage to services. Community behavioral health and SUD providers are left unaware of recent treatments or diagnoses, leading to redundant assessments, delays in care, or even failure to reconnect with any services at all.

Proven Benefits of Data Exchange

Efforts across the country are proving that integrated data exchange works:

• North Carolina’s NC HIEA connects correctional health records with community HIE participants, improving reentry coordination (NC HIEA).

• Camden Coalition in New Jersey demonstrated that access to jail data improved outreach success for high-utilizer populations (Camden Coalition).

• Maricopa County, Arizona implemented a jail reentry program integrating behavioral health data into discharge planning. Participants were 75% less likely to return to jail within 12 months (NACo).

• Community Mental Health Partnership of Southeast Michigan used jail and mental health data to reduce jail days and psychiatric hospitalizations, saving $3.7 million over two years (CMHPSM).

• Pima County, Arizona developed a bidirectional data exchange between jail systems, Medicaid (AHCCCS), and behavioral health agencies, preventing treatment gaps and enhancing Medicaid continuity (Urban Institute).

• Youth Medicaid/CHIP Reentry Projects emphasize the value of release date data and care coordination to maintain continuity for justice-involved youth (Network for Public Health Law).

• A 2024 scoping review found that early primary care contact post-incarceration significantly improves health outcomes and reduces incarceration days (BMC Primary Care).

• A 2024 Sequoia Project brief identifies data exchange as a core mechanism to support reentry under new Medicaid pre-release policies (Health and Reentry Project).

Policy and Fiscal Impact

Justice-involved data sharing isn’t just a clinical imperative—it’s a fiscal one. Repeated incarceration due to untreated behavioral health conditions costs states billions. According to the Council of State Governments Justice Center, counties can spend over $300 per day to incarcerate someone with mental illness (CSG).

By investing in data exchange infrastructure and interoperability with Health Information Exchanges (HIEs), counties and states can:

• Reduce duplicative assessments and ER visits

• Improve Medicaid continuity upon release

• Coordinate warm hand-offs to community-based providers

• Reduce avoidable jail stays related to mental health crises

Recommendations for Implementation

To close the data gap, stakeholders must:

1. Establish data-sharing agreements that address privacy concerns (especially for 42 CFR Part 2-covered SUD data).

2. Integrate correctional health systems into HIEs or other health data platforms to enable both push and query-based access.

3. Develop reentry protocols that ensure medical information follows the individual and supports continuity of care.

4. Build governance frameworks with cross-sector input—including correctional health, behavioral health, public defenders, Medicaid agencies, and peer support networks.

5. Implement real-time notifications to providers when individuals are incarcerated or released to support timely care coordination and continuity.

Conclusion: A Critical Inflection Point

Justice-involved individuals deserve the same standard of care as anyone else—and that starts with access to their health information. A modern, interoperable data exchange between correctional health systems and community-based behavioral health and SUD providers isn’t just a policy goal—it’s a moral, clinical, and financial imperative.

Investing in these connections is not only about reducing recidivism. It’s about acknowledging the humanity of those most at risk, improving public health, and making smarter use of public dollars. For HIEs, behavioral health agencies, and correctional systems, now is the time to bridge this last mile of interoperability.

Need help planning justice-involved data exchange strategies? Converge Health can support stakeholder alignment, consent workflows, and technical integration tailored to your region’s needs.

Let's Talk!